|
|
NOTICE
The Sutter County Assessment Appeals Board No.
1 will meet at 1160 Civic Center Boulevard, Yuba city, California on
various dates for the purpose of equalizing the assessment of
property in Sutter County and will continue in session for that
purpose from time to time until the business of equalization is
disposed of.
Taxpayers who wish to file an application for
hearing for reduction in assessments are advised that the time for
filing applications will be from July 2, 2009, through September 15,
2009, at 5:00 p.m. Before a hearing on an application for reduction
in assessment can be held, the applicant must first fill out an
application on a form provided by the Clerk. Appellants are
encouraged to review the application in person with the County
Assessor, 1160 Civic Center Boulevard, Yuba City, California, prior
to filing the application with the Clerk of the Board of
Supervisors.
Applications forms are available at the office
of the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors, 1160 Civic Center
Boulevard, Yuba City, California; and from the Sutter County
Assessor's Web Page:
http://www.suttercounty.org/doc/government/depts/assessor/assessor.
Application forms may also be requested by telephone from the Clerk
of the Board of Supervisors' Office (530) 822-7106. The Assessment
Appeals Board No. 1 is required to find the full cash value of
property which is the subject of an assessment hearing and if the
board determines that such value differs from the full cash value on
which the assessment is based, the Board will adjust the assessment
by either increasing or decreasing the enrolled value.
DONNA M. JOHNSTON
Clerk-Recorder
by: Karna-Lisa Aucoin, Deputy
June 26, 2009 Ad #00076525
Appeared in: Appeal Democrat
on Friday, 06/26/2009
November 20, 2008 -
Please Answer These Important Questions
City Council Members
City of Yuba City
1201 Civic Center Boulevard
Yuba City, CA 95993
Dear Council Members:
At the November 18, 2008 council meeting, Mayor
Ramirez requested Don Kessel and I reduce to writing questions about
the City’s handling of current and future water needs and financing
thereof. Apparently, the Council and staff were not prepared to
address these serious concerns of Walton area Concerned Citizens at
the meeting. Mr. Kessel has submitted his questions, which are
attached, along with some questions I have raised. Mr. Kessel
requested I forward his questions as he is currently traveling.
·
In the documents submitted with the Proposition 218 ballot
process dated October 8, 2008, the city has told residents in Regions
1, 2, and 3 that they will be receiving surface water and the City has
an adequate supply to serve current customers and all the groundwater
customers. However, last summer, the city applied to activate a well
that exceeds the arsenic standards by the city’s own admission. How
can you tell the residents you have enough water to supply all
groundwater customers in the so-called HWC areas with surface water
and that they are voting on whether to connect to surface water—not
blended water? Why would this deception not negate any Proposition
218 vote based on the fact the customers are not going to receive what
they have been told they would receive for the surcharge?
·
The city has said the groundwater customers will not be
subsidizing development, but the Sutter Heritage and Siller
Development planning documents indicate these developments will be
served by the same 30” pipe Regions 1, 2, and 3 are being asked to pay
for. What is the proportionate share the developers are going to
pay of the $19.8 million loan being sought? What mechanism is in
place or going to be in place to reimburse the groundwater customers
for the costs they may incur if the surcharge is implemented in order
to deliver water to the above two developments?
·
Please provide a response to the November 17, 2008 letter from
Concerned Citizens for Walton Water Customers in Hillcrest Water
System—South Walton Area, specifically answering why the proposed
surcharge would not be a special tax and/or fall under the definition
of an assessment and subject to the processes for establishing an
assessment?
We look forward to receiving your response,
hopefully before the public hearing is scheduled on November 24, 2008,
at 4 p.m.
Sincerely,
Elaine Miles
487 Anita Way
Yuba City, CA 95993
530-671-7916
November 19, 2008
City Council
Hillcrest water users will
soon be making a decision whether or not to convert to surface water.
Below are a few concerns that need to be answered and/or clarified.
A City ordinance requires
anyone out side the City limits to annex before receiving surface water.
The City Council made a decision to exempt Region 1 (which is in a county
area) from this requirement if Region 1 decides to convert to surface
water. The question is, what is the status of the county residents who
reside in Region 2/3? Will they receive the same exemption? Why haven't
they been given the same opportunity to as was given to Region 1 to
separately protest or not protest the City's proposal to convert to
surface water?
It appears that the city
intends to activate a City well (Not a Hillcrest well) to blend with City
surface water - a well that, at the time of the request, exceeds the
arsenic standards. Since we have been told by the City that the City has
plenty of surface water and even sells water why is the City reactivating
this well? Has the City decided to implement a water blending program? Can
city residents expect to receive blended water in the future? Shouldn't
all the City be advised that they will be receiving blended water?
Regions 1 2 and 3 have been
told that they would receive pure surface water. if it is the City's
intent to blend, shouldn't these regions be advised that they will be
receiving something less than pure surface water?
Don Kessel
A concerned Hillcrest water user
SHOULD THE CITY BE COMMITTING US TO ANOTHER NEARLY 1
MILLION DOLLORS FOR A PROJECT THAT: "includes the furnishing of all
labor, materials, tax, equipment and services for the construction and
completion of the Water Treatment Plant Administration Building
Remodel Project."? THIS DOESN''T SEEM TO BE A CRITICAL PROJECT THAT
NEEDS TO BE DONE AT THIS TIME. SINCE WE ARE IN A RECESSION, WHY
DOESN'T THE CITY PULL BACK ON THEIR EXPANSION PLANS? WITH THE
POSSIBILITY OF PERS REQUESTIONING MORE RETIREMENT FUNDS FROM ITS
PARTICIPANTS IT WOULD SEEM THE CITY COUNCIL WOULD BE MORE PRUDENT ON
HOW YOUR MONEY IS SPENT. AFTER ALL FOLKS, THE CITY HAS NO MONEY UNLESS
YOU GIVE IT TO THEM. WRITE AND/OR CALL YOUR COUNCILMEMBER IF YOU THINK
THAT THIS IS AN INAPPROPRIATE EXPENDITURE IN THESE TROUBLING TIMES.
Appeal-Democrat, October 31, 2008 Page D8
SECTION 00020
NOTICE INVITING BIDS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City of Yuba City, hereafter referred
to as “Owner”, will receive SEALED BIDS at the City Hall, City Clerk’s
Office, 1201 Civic Center Blvd., Yuba City, CA 95993 until 3:00 p.m.
local time, on December 10, 2008, for construction of:
Water Treatment Plant Remodel Project
Contract No. 08-30
At said place and time, and promptly thereafter, all Bids that have
been duly received in accordance with the Contract Documents, will be
publicly opened and read aloud. The clock located in the City Clerk’s
office is considered the official time.
Project Description: In accordance with plans and specifications
prepared by Robert Estrada Engineering-Design-Associates and the City
of Yuba City, the Work includes the furnishing of all labor,
materials, tax, equipment and services for the construction and
completion of the Water Treatment Plant Administration Building
Remodel Project.
The total Contract Time to achieve Final Completion is 180 calendar
days.
The estimated cost of construction is $840,000.
At the time the Contract is bid, awarded and for the duration of the
contract, the Owner has determined that the General Contractor shall
possess a valid State of California Class B- General Building
Contractor’ License. Failure to possess the specified license shall
render the bid as non-responsive. Bidders must comply with the
provisions of the Business and Professions Code Section 7028.15 by
setting forth their license number and expiration date on their bid.
A full set of Contract Documents and all information available to
Bidders, as further defined in Section 00200, INFORMATION AVAILABLE TO
BIDDERS, may be examined at the Owner’s Engineering Division during
regular business hours. Bidders may also purchase a copy of the
Contract Documents and related information from the Owner on the
following basis:
Document DescriptionNon-Refundable Charges
Complete half-size set of Contract$75.00 + $15.00 if mailed at
Documents (specifications and half-sizeOwner’s expense
drawings). Set will also include a CD
containing pdf files of non-scale drawings
and specs)
Optional full-size drawings (drawings only).$150.00 + $20.00 if mailed
at
Available only to Bidders who purchase aOwner’s expense
complete set of Contract Documents.
Individual drawings will not be sold separately.
Procedural questions regarding the purchase of Contract Documents
and/or obtain a plan holders list should be directed to Sandra
Barcenas at the Public works Department at (530) 822-4626. Mailed in
requests with payment for Contract Documents shall be mailed to:
City of Yuba City Public Works Department
1201 Civic Center Blvd
Yuba City, CA 95993
Attn: Sandra Barcenas
Checks should be made payable to: City of Yuba City. Charges are not
refundable, regardless of whether the documents are returned or not.
Complete sets of Contract Documents must be used in preparing Bids.
The Owner does not assume responsibility for errors or
misinterpretations resulting from the use of incomplete sets of
Contract Documents.
The Owner, in making copies of the Contract Documents available on the
above terms, does so only for the purpose of obtaining Bids for the
Work and does not confer license or grant for any other use.
A mandatory pre-bid walk-through meeting will be held on November 18,
2008 at 10:00 a.m. at 701 Northgate Drive, Yuba City, CA 95991. At
this meeting, representatives of Owner and the Design Engineer will
discuss the bid documents, site constraints, order of work and other
items specific to this project. A project walk-through will follow. A
sign-in sheet will be available up until commencement of the pre-bid
walk through meeting only. Attendance at the entire pre-bid meeting
and walk-through is mandatory for bidding. Bids received from Bidders
who did not sign the sign-in sheet and attend the meeting and
walk-through will be returned to the Bidder unopened. Attendance by
subcontractors is not mandatory, but all interested prospective
subcontractors are encouraged to attend. The Owner will transmit to
all recipients of complete sets of Contract Documents such Addenda as
Owner considers necessary in response to questions raised at the
meeting and walk-through. Oral statements not confirmed by Addenda may
not be relied upon and are not binding or legally effective. Except
for mandatory walk-through, no other access to the project site will
be granted pre-bid without the Owner’s approval. During all site
visits the Bidder must be accompanied full time by an authorized
representative of the Owner. No exceptions to this requirement.
Written questions regarding the Contract Documents and/or the proposed
Work should be directed to Ian Pietz, Associate Engineer, by phone at
(530) 822-7685, facsimile at (530) 822-7574 or e-mail at ipietz@yubacity.net
no later than ten (10) calendar days before the time specified for
opening bids.
Bidding procedures are prescribed in the Contract Documents. Bids
shall be executed upon the Bid Forms bound and made a part of the Bid
Documents. All prescribed Bid Forms may be removed from the Contract
Documents for submission in a sealed envelope.
A Bid Guaranty in an amount not less than ten percent (10%) of the
total aggregate of the bid, including all Additive and/or Alternate
Bid Items shall accompany each bid. This Bid Guaranty is to be
forfeited should the Bidder, if awarded the contract, fail to enter
into the same, or fails to furnish the bonds and/or proof of insurance
as stipulated in the Contract Documents. The checks or bond shall be
made payable to the Owner.
The successful Bidder will be required to furnish both a Faithful
Performance Bond in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) and a
Payment Bond in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the
Contract price.
Pursuant to the provisions of California Labor Code Section 6707, each
bid submitted in response to this Invitation to Bid shall contain, as
a separate bid item, adequate sheeting, shoring, and bracing, or
equivalent method, for the protection of life or limb in trenches and
open excavation, exceeding five feet, which shall conform to
applicable safety orders. By entering an amount for this bid item, the
Bidder warrants that its action does not convey tort liability to the
Owner, the Engineer, the Construction Manager, and their officers,
employees, agents, and subconsultants.
Pursuant to Sections 1770, et. seq., of the California Labor Code, the
successful Bidder shall pay not less than the prevailing rate of per
diem wages as determined by the Director of the California Department
of Industrial Relations. Copies of such prevailing rate of per diem
wages are on file at the Owner’s Engineering Department where copies
will be made available to any interested party on request. These rate
determinations may also be found on the State of California Department
of Industrial Relations’ website at http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWageDetermination.htm.
The successful contractor and its subcontractors shall employ the
appropriate number of apprentices, in each apprenticeable craft, on
the project site as stipulated in California Labor Code, 1777.5.
The successful Bidder must insure that its policies and practices
provide equal opportunity to all applicants and employees without
regard to race, color, creed, sex, age, religion, ancestry,
citizenship, national origin, handicap, mental condition, veteran or
marital status. The successful Bidder must comply with the Americans
with Disabilities Act.
Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 22300, for monies earned by
the Contractor and withheld by the Owner to ensure the performance of
the Contract, the Contractor, may, at its option, choose to substitute
securities meeting the requirements of Public Contract Code Section
22300, or have the retained, earned monies deposited in an escrow
account at a federal or state chartered bank.
No bid received and read aloud may be withdrawn for a period of sixty
(60) days after the bid opening date, except pursuant to Public
Contract Code Section 5101 et seq.
Telephones will not be available to Bidders at the Owner’s offices for
the preparation of bids or for communicating bid results. Bid forms
received after the designated time will not be opened and will be
returned to the Bidder unopened.
Bidders shall develop and submit bids at their own expense. The Owner
will not reimburse any costs associated with the development and
submittal of any and all bids.
The Owner reserves the right to award the Contract, to reject any and
all Bids, to waive irregularities, and to reject nonconforming,
nonresponsive or conditional Bids.
DATED:Terrel Locke, City Clerk
Oct. 31 & Nov. 7Ad #00059845
Editor's Notebook
November
10, 2008 - 5:28PM
Speaking of
new cool stuff — have you been to the A-D Web site's
Info Center lately? Go to the homepage
and click on the "Interact" tab to check out our latest offering: a
public salaries database that shows what local governments are spending
on employee salaries. The database can be searched by county, city, job
title or salary range.
There was
some consideration early on in the information-gathering process whether
to include employees' names, but it was decided that listing the names
of rank-and-file county and city employees is not critical to our
overall goal. What is important is for you to know how your hard-earned
dollars are being spent.
 \
NOTICE OF ELECTION
NOTICE BY THE SUTTER COUNTY CLERK OF
THOSE
OFFICES TO BE ELECTED AT THE GENERAL ELECTION
November 4, 2008
Notice is hereby given that the following offices
are to be elected at the General Election to be held in Sutter County on
the Tuesday, November 4, 2008.
FEDERAL/STATE
President/Vice President
US Rep in Congress 2nd District
State Assembly 2nd District
SUPERVISORIAL
1st District - Runoff
CITY OF YUBA CITY
Candidates must reside within the city limits and must be registered
to vote. Nomination papers are to be obtained at the City of Yuba City
Clerk’s office, at 1201 Civic Center Blvd., Yuba City, Ca.
City Council Member - 2 seats
Treasurer - 1 seat
City Clerk - 1 seat
CITY OF LIVE OAK
Candidates must reside within the city limits and must be registered
to vote. Nomination papers are to be obtained at the City of Live Oak
Clerk’s office, at 9955 Live Oak Blvd, Live Oak, Ca.
City Council Member - 2 seats
SCHOOL DISTRICTS
Candidates must reside in the school/trustee area and must be
registered to vote. Declaration of Candidacy forms are to be obtained at
the Elections Office, at 1435 Veterans Memorial Circle, Yuba City, Ca.
Yuba Community College - Trustee Area 1 – 1 seat
Yuba Community College – Trustee Area 2 – 1 seat
Yuba City Unified – Trustee Area 1 – 2 seats
Yuba City Unified – Trustee Area 2 – 1 seat
Live Oak Unified – Trustee Area 1 – 1 seat
Live Oak Unified – Trustee Area 3 – 1 seat
Live Oak Unified – Trustee Area 4 – 1 seat
Brittan School District – 2 seats
Browns School District – 3 seats
East Nicolaus High School – 3 seats
Franklin School District – 2 seats
Marcum Illinois School District – 3 seats
Meridian School District – 2 seats
Nuestro School District – 1 seat
Pleasant Grove School District – 3 seats
Sutter Union High School – 2 seats (1 long term and 1 short term)
Winship-Robbins School District – 2 seats
BOARD OF EDUCATION
Board of Education Trustee Area 1 – 1 seat
Board of Education Trustee Area 3 – 2 seats (1 long term and 1 short term)
Board of Education Trustee Area 4 – 1 seat
NOMINATION PERIOD BEGINS ON JULY 14, 2008 THROUGH AUGUST 8, 2008 SHOULD
THE INCUMBENTS FAIL TO FILE BY 5:00 P.M. ON FRIDAY AUGUST 8, 2008. THE
NOMINATION PERIOD WILL BE EXTENDED TO AUGUST 13, 2008 BY 5:00 P.M.
Vote By Mail ballot processing may begin approximately, but no earlier
than 8:00 a.m. on October 24, 2008. All procedures are open to the public
and all interested parties will be afforded the opportunity to observe the
procedures. The process will be conducted at the Sutter County Elections
Office, 1435 Veterans Memorial Circle, Yuba City, Ca.
Ballots will be counted at a central counting place located at the Sutter
County Elections Office, 1435 Veterans Memorial Circle, Yuba City, Ca
beginning at 8:00 p.m. on November 4, 2008. This process is open to the
public.
Polling places will be open from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. on Tuesday,
November 4, 2008.
The Elections Office will be open at 7:00 a.m. on Tuesday, November 4,
2008.
DONNA JOHNSTON, SUTTER CO. CLERK/REGISTRAR OF VOTERS
BY: Chris Goforth, Assistant Registrar of Voters
This document is a California Water Plan Update concerning the
use of groundwater. This issue, along with other water issues, will be
reviewed by the Department Of Water Resources/Sacramento River
Hydrologic Region. There will be a workshop covering water use at the
Veterans
Memorial
Building on April
2, 2008 at 10:00am. The attached document is a short read but very
informative. In my opinion, this document clearly indicates how
out-of-tune the Utilities Department and the Ad-Hoc Committee has been
in attempting to shut down the Hillcrest Water System and to ignore
blending as a long-term solution. Adequate quantity of water is the
life’s blood to any community – more important than any other service
provided to our citizens! Without water there would be no City. I
firmly believe that we need to save our wells and integrate and blend
the City’s the two water systems. The City needs to halt the present
path they are on with shutting down the Hillcrest water system! The
City needs to review and revamp the existing Water Master Plan to
bring it into tune with the current water problems of today. Future
development should be based on the immediate and long term
availability of water at reasonable cost and should be the main factor
in determining sensible growth. While housing development, roads,
schools and retail sales are necessary, none of these could be
accomplished without water. While the City struggles on with the
problems of housing development,
Plumas Street, Roxy
Theater, street vendors, etc.,- I think the City “loses sight of the
forest because of the trees”. We need to prioritize and focus on the
most important item – water! We need to revitalize the existing well
systems. At last report the City’s surface water contracts are for
29,600 acre feet annual (afa). The City’s current use of that water is
14,000 afa. Could that water be used to recharge our aquifer? Since
15,500 afa is 0 costs to the city have we been missing the opportunity
of recharging our aquifer with “free”water? Will you please pass the
attached document on to your fellow council members?
Don Kessel;
To: Walton Water
Residents from Sylvia Oakley
Although I
do not live in the Walton 2/3 region, as a concerned neighbor and
friend, I have observed the dispute between Walton Water customers and
the City and I have gotten involved.
As
many of you know, I have assisted in gathering signatures to protest
the proposed rate for hooking up to surface water and have attended
the ad hoc committee meetings. I have also spoken to several of the
City Council members personally,
and on January 15th, I
spoke before the full Council.
I expressed to them the concerns I was hearing from homeowners, and I
explained the fears of some about possibly losing their homes due to
the proposed hookup fees.
As I
continue to walk the Walton area, I listen to your concerns and pass
on to those who have not been able to attend the ad hoc committee
meetings, updates as to what was being discussed. I fully support an
equitable resolution to this problem. The City made certain promises
to Walton area residents at the time of annexation and they should
keep those promises. Please be assured that I will continue to be of
assistance until this matter is resolved.
Sincerely,
Sylvia Oakley
Yuba City Council Meeting, March 4, 2008
This is a Heads Up on
Agenda Item 12 from the Agenda for City Council held on
Tuesday, March 4, 2008. Please read the Item and see
the meeting at
www.yubacity.com.
Item 12 on the Agenda will apply Prop 18 to 3 or 4
Districts for increased tax assessments to Yuba City
residents. It is not clear if the Walton Area will
be affected. (The Walton area is District 1).
The increase is for
street lights and landscaping. This will show how
the City will be applying Prop 13 to increase tax
assessments. You will be able to vote on this issue.
Please go to the City Web-site and read Agenda Item 12 for
the meeting held on March 4, 2008. It was approved
at a "cost of not to exceed $69,000"
Per the Agenda: The item is for a firm:
Professional Services etc.
“for
Maintenance District Re-engineering and
Re-balloting in accordance with the requirements of
Proposition 218 for District 1, District 2 and District
5.”
THIS WILL BE A VOTED ON ISSUE TO AN
INCREASED ASSESSMENT ADJUSTMENT.
The city has an actual outreach
program. Per the Agenda, “Ballots out in June and
finish in the Fall.” Yuba City residents will be
affected and also this will be an example of how the City
will apply Prop. 218 to establish new Special Tax
Districts.
All items passed except that Item 15 was “pulled.”
(Not voted on.)
|